Weekstarter: Key Events and Stories to Watch This Week - Monday February 24, 2025
Welcome to the inaugural edition of "Weekstarter: Key Events and Stories to Watch This Week." It's been just over a month since President Donald Trump was sworn in for his second term on January 20, 2025, yet the whirlwind of events makes it feel much longer.
With approximately 47 months remaining until his term concludes in January 2029, we must hold on, stay informed, and navigate this journey together—whether you're a newly naturalized citizen or have been an American for decades.
This series will run every Monday, providing you with essential updates to start your week.
Dive into this week's highlights below, explore more on our website, and don't forget to check out the dozen or so current events we've covered in our Current Events tab since January 2025.
As we embark on the week of February 24, 2025, the global stage is set with pivotal events and developments that demand our attention. From significant political maneuvers in the United States to critical international updates, staying informed is more crucial than ever.
A) Political Landscape
1) New Policy Alert: Trump Administration Directs ICE to Remove Unaccompanied Migrant Kids
The Trump administration has instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to find and deport migrant children who entered the U.S. without their parents. This move is part of a broader plan to increase deportations. An internal memo, reviewed by Reuters journalists Marisa Taylor, Ted Hesson, and Kristina Cooke, outlines this initiative.
Scope of the Initiative
Since 2019, over 600,000 children have crossed the U.S.-Mexico border alone. Many have been ordered to leave the country, including more than 31,000 who missed court dates. The ICE memo describes a four-step plan, starting with preparation on January 27. However, it doesn't say when deportations will begin.
Operational Priorities
ICE has divided these unaccompanied children into three groups: "flight risk," "public safety," and "border security." Agents are told to focus on those considered "flight risks," such as children who missed court dates or were placed with sponsors who aren't relatives. The agency plans to use various databases and records to locate these children.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
U.S. law allows the deportation of migrants, including children, who have no legal right to stay. In the past, the government mainly targeted adults with criminal records. The memo states that this new effort aims to enforce immigration laws and protect children from trafficking and exploitation.
Historical Context
In his first term, President Trump started a "zero tolerance" policy, which led to children being separated from their parents at the border. This policy ended in 2018 after widespread criticism, but up to 1,000 children remain separated from their parents. The current directive renews attention on unaccompanied minors within the larger immigration enforcement strategy.
Implications for Communities
Many of these children live with sponsors, often in homes with other undocumented immigrants. Enforcing this directive could cause more fear and instability in these communities, as ICE operations might also affect other undocumented people living in the same places.
As this policy develops, it's important for affected individuals and communities to stay informed and seek legal help to understand their rights and options.
This blog post is based on the article "Trump officials launch ICE effort to deport unaccompanied migrant children" by Marisa Taylor, Ted Hesson, and Kristina Cooke, published by Reuters.
2) State Legislatures Target Local Officials Defying Federal Immigration Enforcement
Republican lawmakers in over 20 states are proposing laws to punish local officials who don't cooperate with federal immigration authorities. These proposals include threats of lawsuits, fines, and even jail time for those who enforce "sanctuary" policies, which limit assistance with federal immigration enforcement.
In Georgia, Republican state Sen. Blake Tillery introduced a bill allowing people to sue local governments and officials who violate the state's ban on sanctuary policies. This bill has passed the Senate and is now being considered in the House. Sen. Tillery stated that the aim is to support those affected by local governments not following Georgia's immigration laws.
Critics worry that such legislation might pressure local police to detain immigrants longer than federal law allows, fearing legal consequences.
Democratic state Sen. Nikki Merritt of Georgia expressed concern, saying, "We're threatening our local law enforcement who are doing the best job they can to keep our communities safe."
This movement isn't limited to Georgia. States like Louisiana, Florida, Tennessee, Wyoming, and New Hampshire are also pushing bills targeting sanctuary policies. For example, Louisiana's Attorney General Liz Murrill sued the Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, claiming it doesn't comply with the state's ban on sanctuary policies. Similarly, Florida's new law requires legal action against local governments that refuse federal detention requests, imposing fines up to $5,000 on officials who intentionally violate the ban.
These state efforts align with the Trump administration's broader crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice has sued areas like Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County, accusing them of breaking federal law by not cooperating with immigration authorities.
Opponents argue that these measures could instill fear in immigrant communities and strain local resources. Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney in Atlanta, believes these initiatives are part of "Donald Trump's war on immigrants," suggesting that local officials are passing laws to gain favor with the administration without solving real problems.
As these bills move through state legislatures, debates continue over balancing federal immigration enforcement with local control, raising questions about community trust and public safety.
This blog post is based on the article "States threaten fines and jail time for local officials who won’t help enforce immigration law" by Charlotte Kramon and David A. Lieb, published by the Associated Press.
3) Trump's Ukraine Peace Deal: A Threat to Global Principles and Stability
In a recent development, President Donald Trump has initiated a rapid peace agreement with Russia concerning the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This move has raised significant concerns about the potential long-term consequences for international principles and norms established over decades.
A Swift Concession
During talks in Saudi Arabia, U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz emphasized that "only President Trump" could have shifted the global conversation to end the war in Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed this sentiment, highlighting Trump's unique role in the process. However, critics argue that the administration has conceded to key Russian demands even before formal negotiations have commenced. These concessions include:
No requirement for Russia to return Ukrainian territories acquired by force.
Excluding Ukraine from NATO membership.
No deployment of American troops on Ukrainian soil.
Additionally, President Trump has referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as a "dictator" and suggested that Ukraine must act swiftly to avoid further losses, a stance that has been met with approval from senior Russian officials.
Personal Dynamics Influencing Policy
Analysts suggest that President Trump's approach may be influenced by his personal history with President Zelensky. In 2019, during a phone call, Trump requested that Zelensky investigate alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and probe activities related to Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. Zelensky's refusal to comply with these requests, despite the withholding of military aid, may have strained their relationship, potentially impacting current U.S. policy decisions.
Implications for International Norms
The United States has historically championed the principle that acquiring territory by force is illegitimate. This principle has been central to international law and order since World War II. The current U.S. stance on Ukraine, which appears to acquiesce to Russian territorial gains, could undermine this long-standing doctrine, potentially encouraging similar actions by other nations and destabilizing global peace and security.
A Shift in Global Alliances
This policy shift signifies a realignment of U.S. foreign policy, moving away from traditional alliances and established international norms. By prioritizing a swift resolution over the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, the U.S. risks emboldening authoritarian regimes and weakening the global framework that deters acts of aggression.
As the situation unfolds, it remains crucial to monitor how these decisions will impact not only Ukraine but also the broader international community and the future of global security structures.
This blog post is based on the article "Trump is surrendering much more than Ukraine to Putin" by Fareed Zakaria, published by The Washington Post.
B) Policy Updates
1) Republican Senate Passes Policy-Focused Bill, Excludes Tax Cuts
In a significant legislative move, the U.S. Senate has passed a Republican-backed bill focusing on immigration, energy, and defense policies. Notably, this bill excludes President Donald Trump's proposed tax cuts, opting instead to address immediate policy areas.
Senate's Legislative Focus
In the early hours of Friday, February 21, 2025, the Senate approved a resolution directing increased spending on defense initiatives, strict immigration and border security measures, and the promotion of fossil fuel development. The vote concluded with a 52-48 majority, with all Republicans supporting the measure except Senator Rand Paul, who proposed an unsuccessful amendment aimed at reducing spending.
Divergence from House Proposal
President Trump had expressed a preference for the House of Representatives' version of the bill, which includes an extension of $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. However, due to the House's narrow and divided 218-215 majority, passing such a comprehensive bill presents challenges. The Senate's decision to advance a more focused resolution serves as a contingency plan, should the House struggle to reach consensus on funding the tax cuts without significantly increasing the national debt or cutting popular programs like Medicaid and Social Security.
Budgetary Implications
The Senate's $340 billion fiscal 2025 budget resolution allocates an additional $85 billion annually over four years. These funds are designated for enhancing border security, facilitating the deportation of undocumented immigrants, deregulating energy policies, and bolstering military spending. In contrast, the House's proposal seeks to couple these priorities with substantial tax cuts, aiming to offset costs through $2 trillion in spending reductions and projected economic growth spurred by the proposed policy changes.
Legislative Process and Partisan Dynamics
For President Trump's legislative agenda to advance efficiently, both the Senate and the House must pass the same budget resolution. This alignment would enable Republicans to utilize a parliamentary procedure that circumvents potential Democratic opposition and the Senate filibuster. Despite the Senate's progress, House Republicans face internal divisions, particularly concerning the financing of the proposed tax cuts without adversely affecting essential social programs or exacerbating the national debt.
Amendments and Debates
During the Senate's deliberations, only two Republican-sponsored amendments were adopted. These amendments aim to reduce regulatory burdens, control federal spending, and protect programs like Medicaid and Medicare.
Democrats, holding a minority position, engaged in an extensive "vote-a-rama" session, proposing numerous amendments and voicing concerns that the bill prioritizes tax breaks for the wealthy at the expense of essential healthcare services. However, their efforts did not result in significant changes to the bill.
Understanding the Legislative Process
This legislative activity offers insight into how laws are made in the United States:
Introduction of a Bill: A member of Congress proposes a bill, which is then assigned to a committee for detailed examination.
Committee Review: The committee studies the bill, may hold hearings, and can suggest changes. If the committee votes to approve the bill, it moves forward; otherwise, it may be tabled or rejected.
Debate and Voting: The full chamber (either the House or the Senate) debates the bill. Members can propose amendments. A vote is then taken; if the bill passes, it is sent to the other chamber for consideration.
Reconciliation: If the second chamber makes changes, and the originating chamber does not agree, both must work together to reconcile differences, often through a conference committee.
Presidential Action: Once both chambers agree on the final version, the bill is sent to the President, who can sign it into law or veto it. Congress can override a veto with a two-thirds majority in both chambers.
This structured process ensures that legislation is thoroughly reviewed and debated, reflecting the system of checks and balances fundamental to the U.S. government.
This blog post is based on the article "US Senate passes Republican border security bill without Trump tax cuts" by Gabriella Borter, published by Reuters.
2) San Diego's 'Super Sanctuary' Policy Faces Opposition from County Sheriff
In December 2024, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors approved a policy limiting the Sheriff's Department from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
This policy requires local law enforcement to obtain a judicial warrant before sharing information about an individual's immigration status with federal agencies.
The goal is to protect immigrant communities and maintain public trust. However, Sheriff Kelly Martinez has stated she will not comply with this policy, believing that existing state laws already balance public safety and community trust.
3) Legislative Effort to Amend California's Sanctuary Laws Unveiled
At the state level, California Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, representing San Diego, introduced Senate Bill 554 in February 2025. This bill aims to amend the state's sanctuary laws by requiring local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities in cases involving violent offenders.
The legislation also seeks to prevent local jurisdictions from enacting sanctuary policies that offer greater protections than those at the state level. This proposal has sparked debate among lawmakers and community members about the balance between public safety and immigrant protections.
4) California's Ongoing Discussion on Sanctuary Laws and Immigrant Protections
California has a longstanding history of implementing sanctuary policies to protect undocumented immigrants. In 2017, the state enacted the California Values Act (SB 54), which limits local and state law enforcement agencies' involvement in federal immigration enforcement.
This legislation aims to foster trust between immigrant communities and local authorities by ensuring that state resources are not used for mass deportations. However, recent legislative efforts, such as Senate Bill 554 introduced in February 2025, indicate ongoing discussions about the scope and application of these protections.
SB 554 seeks to amend existing sanctuary laws by requiring local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities in cases involving violent offenders and preventing local jurisdictions from enacting policies that offer greater protections than those at the state level.
This proposal has sparked debate among lawmakers and community members about balancing public safety and immigrant protections.
5) Guidance from the State Attorney General
In December 2024, California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued updated guidance to help immigrants understand their rights and protections under state law.
This initiative aims to provide clarity amid potential changes in federal immigration policies and to ensure that immigrants are aware of the resources and legal safeguards available to them in California.
The guidance emphasizes that all children, regardless of immigration status, have the right to a free public education and that schools are generally prohibited from sharing student information without consent.
Additionally, it highlights that state and local law enforcement agencies are restricted from assisting in federal immigration enforcement, with limited exceptions. Attorney General Bonta's efforts are part of a broader commitment to uphold the rights of immigrant communities and maintain their trust in public institutions.
Source: Office of CA Attorney General Rob Bonta
6) Federal-State Tensions
The return of President Donald Trump to office has intensified conflicts between federal immigration policies and California's sanctuary laws.
The Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal funding from jurisdictions that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. In response, California has allocated funds to defend its policies and support immigrants facing deportation. This ongoing tension highlights the complex interplay between state and federal approaches to immigration.
7) DOJ Drops Corruption Charges Against NYC Mayor Eric Adams Amid Allegations of Quid Pro Quo with Trump Administration
In recent developments, New York City Mayor Eric Adams is embroiled in a significant controversy involving the Trump administration. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently moved to dismiss federal corruption charges against Mayor Adams, leading to allegations of a quid pro quo arrangement.
Background of the Allegations
Mayor Adams faced federal charges related to bribery and illegal campaign contributions. However, the DOJ, under the direction of acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, instructed prosecutors to drop these charges. This decision has been criticized as potentially politically motivated, suggesting that the dismissal was in exchange for Mayor Adams's support of President Trump's immigration policies. Notably, several federal prosecutors, including acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, resigned in protest over this directive.
Denials and Political Repercussions
Both Mayor Adams and the Trump administration have denied any quid pro quo arrangement. Despite these denials, the situation has led to significant political fallout, including multiple resignations within the DOJ and calls for further investigation into the matter.
This unfolding situation highlights the complex interplay between federal and local governments and raises important questions about the integrity of legal processes in politically sensitive cases.
These developments underscore the dynamic and often contentious nature of immigration policy in California, reflecting broader national debates on the rights and protections afforded to immigrants.
Watch the coverage below to learn more!
Also, read Amba Law’s coverage of this on going drama!
C) International Highlights:
Key Updates on Global Events
a) Health of Pope Francis
Pope Francis, aged 88, remains in critical condition at Rome's Gemelli Hospital, battling double pneumonia and mild kidney failure. Despite his serious health challenges, the Pope remains alert and has participated in Mass with medical staff. The Vatican reports that while his condition is critical, there have been no further respiratory crises since Saturday. Supporters worldwide continue to offer prayers for his recovery.
b) Hamas and Palestine Conflict Updates
The ceasefire between Israel and Hamas faces significant challenges this week. Israel has postponed the release of 620 Palestinian prisoners, citing "repeated and ongoing violations by Hamas," including the use of hostage handovers for propaganda purposes. In response, Hamas has condemned the delay, accusing Israel of jeopardizing the ceasefire agreement. The situation remains tense, with both sides exchanging accusations and the truce hanging in the balance.
c) Sudanese Civil War Developments
In Sudan, the nearly two-year civil war continues to escalate. The Sudanese military has successfully broken a yearlong siege by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on the strategic city of Obeid, reopening vital supply routes. Concurrently, the RSF and allied groups have signed a charter to establish a "government of peace and unity," indicating a potential move toward partitioning the country. These developments highlight the deepening divisions and ongoing humanitarian crisis in Sudan.
These unfolding events underscore the dynamic and often volatile nature of global affairs, emphasizing the importance of staying informed on international issues.
Read more of our coverage in our Current Events blog!
E) Community Engagement
In our Community Engagement section, we spotlight the vibrant events that knit our community together.
From cultural festivals and art exhibitions to local markets and educational workshops, we provide you with the latest updates on happenings in and around Auburn. Stay informed about opportunities to connect, celebrate, and contribute to our dynamic community life.
1) Celebrating S&S Friendly Ranch: A Pillar of San Diego's Black-Owned Business Community
S&S Friendly Ranch is a historic Black-owned business with a contemporary commitment to serving the San Diego community. Founded 45 years ago in the South Bay region by siblings Sim Wallace and Sarah Buncom, the place is now run by Sim’s granddaughter Diamond Wallace-Brandon, and is not only a working ranch but a premier event venue and a hub for agricultural education. In 2024, the business was chosen for the San Diego Tourism Authority’s Tourism Accelerator program. In honor of Black History Month, we talked recently with Wallace-Brandon about the ranch’s story, its mission and her own San Diego inspirations.
As we conclude Black History Month, it's an opportune time to honor and support local Black-owned businesses that contribute significantly to our community. One such establishment is S&S Friendly Ranch, a family-owned ranch in San Diego with a rich history and a commitment to education and sustainability.
A Legacy of Community Engagement
Founded in 1980 by siblings Sim Wallace and Sarah Buncom, S&S Friendly Ranch has been a cornerstone of the San Diego community for over four decades.
Now managed by Sim's granddaughter, Diamond Wallace-Brandon, the ranch continues to thrive as a hub for agricultural education, regenerative land stewardship, and community events. Their nonprofit organization, Servicing Every Soul, offers programs that teach youth and families about sustainable farming, animal care, and environmental conservation.
Why Visit S&S Friendly Ranch?
Educational Opportunities: Engage in workshops that cover topics like regenerative agriculture, composting, and the use of native plants and herbs.
Petting Zoo: Interact with a variety of friendly animals, offering a hands-on experience for visitors of all ages.
Community Events: Participate in gatherings that foster mutual healing and connection between people and the land.
Support Local: By visiting, you're supporting a Black-owned business dedicated to uplifting the community and promoting sustainable practices.
To learn more about S&S Friendly Ranch and their upcoming events, visit their official website: https://www.ssfriendlyranch.org/.
Embrace the spirit of Black History Month by connecting with local heritage and contributing to initiatives that make a positive impact in our community.
2) Explore San Diego's Cultural Gems: Museum Month
As we approach the end of February, there's still time to take advantage of San Diego Museum Month, which offers half-price admission to over 70 museums, historic sites, gardens, zoos, and aquariums throughout the county. This annual event is a fantastic opportunity to explore the rich cultural and educational experiences San Diego has to offer. To participate, simply download your Museum Month Pass directly to your cell phone or pick one up at any San Diego Public Library. Present your pass at any participating venue to receive 50% off admission for up to four people. This offer is valid until February 28, 2025, so don't miss out!
To make the most of Museum Month and support local institutions like S&S Friendly Ranch, plan your visits before the month concludes. For more information and to download your Museum Month Pass, visit the San Diego Museum Council's official website:
Experience the diverse cultural landscape of San Diego and take advantage of these special offers before they end on Friday!
3) Dive into Discovery: San Diego Festival of Science & Engineering Returns March 1, 2025
Discover the wonders of STEM education at the 2025 San Diego Festival of Science & Engineering! Join the fun at Petco Park in downtown San Diego on Saturday, March 1, from 11:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
This free event features over 125 exhibitors, hands-on activities, a dedicated College & Career Connections area, and a vibrant Art Pavilion. Perfect for all ages—from pre-K to gray—this festival promises a day filled with curiosity, creativity, and inspiration!
F) Cultural Highlights
Upcoming Ramadan 2025 Events in San Diego
Ramadan Kareem!
Ramadan, the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar, is a significant period of fasting, prayer, and reflection for Muslims worldwide. In 2025, Ramadan is expected to begin on the evening of Friday, February 28, and conclude on Sunday, March 30, with the exact dates contingent upon the sighting of the moon. islamic-relief.org
During this sacred month, Muslims fast from dawn until sunset, refraining from eating, drinking, and other physical needs, to purify the soul and develop self-discipline. The fast is broken each evening with a meal called iftar, often starting with the consumption of dates and water, followed by a larger meal shared with family and friends. The pre-dawn meal before the fast begins is known as suhoor. Ramadan is also marked by increased prayer, especially the nightly Tarawih prayers, and recitation of the Quran. The month culminates in the celebration of Eid al-Fitr, a festive holiday marking the end of fasting and a time for communal prayers, feasting, and giving charity.
In San Diego, several events and programs are planned to observe this holy month:
Islamic Center of San Diego (ICSD): ICSD will be hosting various programs throughout Ramadan 2025. Details will be available on their official website as the month approaches. icsd.org
Noor Collective: Beginning Friday, February 28, Noor Collective will offer nightly programs featuring Shaykh Mahdi Mohammadpour and Seyed Ali Musawi. These gatherings aim to foster community engagement and spiritual growth.
G) Conclusion
As the week unfolds, these narratives will undoubtedly evolve, influencing both national and international landscapes.
Staying informed empowers us to engage thoughtfully and respond effectively to the challenges and opportunities that arise.
We encourage you to delve deeper into these topics, participate in community discussions, and continue exploring our Current Events section for ongoing updates and analyses.
Together, through awareness and action, we can navigate the complexities of our times. Have a great start to your last week of February 2025. See you Wednesday!